Background: Key performance indicators like lawsuit rates are often used within the industry to assess the quality of services or products. After all, these rates indicate how many legal proceedings an insurer had to initiate against its customers. However, the actual informative value of such metrics for service quality is disputed.
Advertisement
Interpreting Lawsuit Rates: Not Always a Simple Story
While high lawsuit rates can indeed point to a litigation-prone practice and low rates might suggest good customer service, not every lawsuit initiated by an insurer should be viewed negatively. Some legal actions are taken for the benefit of the collective policyholders—for example, to defend against unjustified claims. Justified claim denials also frequently lead to lawsuits.
Nevertheless, this data appears sensitive for the industry. Many private health insurance (PKV) companies remain tight-lipped and do not want their rates publicized. This context is crucial when reviewing the figures from the eleven companies presented below. While some rates are higher (and thus "worse") than others, all the data comes from those few PKV insurers who already distinguish themselves through their transparency.
The Transparency Gap: Only 11 of 30 Companies Disclosed
Thirty companies were contacted for the new PKV rating in the MAP Report; only eleven were willing to provide their lawsuit rates. This significant lack of disclosure highlights a major transparency issue in the German private health insurance sector. For consumers seeking the best PKV coverage, such data could be vital for making an informed choice.
Advertisement
Understanding the Data Source
All rates are taken from the new PKV overall rating in MAP Report number 927—a rating covering the areas of balance sheet, service, and contract. The lawsuit rates represent averages for the years 2017 to 2021. The full report, along with other editions of this traditional rating, can be ordered separately.
Key Takeaways for Consumers and Advisors
This report underscores several important points for anyone navigating health insurance options:
- Transparency as a Quality Signal: The willingness of a company to disclose potentially sensitive metrics like lawsuit rates can itself be a positive indicator of corporate culture and customer focus.
- Context is Everything: A lawsuit rate should not be viewed in isolation. It must be considered alongside other factors like customer satisfaction scores, claims processing times, and financial stability.
- The Role of Independent Advice: This information gap makes the role of a qualified, independent insurance broker or financial advisor even more critical. They have the expertise and industry insight to evaluate insurers beyond publicly available data.
A US Perspective: Transparency in Health Insurance
For American readers, this discussion has direct parallels. While the US does not typically publish insurer-specific "lawsuit rates," transparency and consumer protection are central themes. US consumers rely on:
- State Insurance Department Complaint Ratios: These public metrics show the number of complaints against an insurer relative to its market share, offering insight into customer service issues.
- Medicare Star Ratings: For Medicare Advantage and Part D plans, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) publishes detailed star ratings based on customer service, complaints, and quality of care.
- NAIC Consumer Information Source: The National Association of Insurance Commissioners provides tools to compare insurers' financial health and complaint history.
The challenge of obtaining clear, comparable performance data is universal. Whether you're choosing a German PKV provider or a US Private Health Insurance plan, seeking out transparent companies and leveraging independent expert advice are your best strategies for securing reliable, high-quality coverage.