"I am privately insured. Can I, as a female artist or artist, become publicly insured again?" Such and similar questions are frequently found online. Those who work artistically have so far had two options: On the one hand, creatives can try to obtain health insurance through the Artists' Social Fund (Künstlersozialkasse, KSK). Even as self-employed individuals, they are then treated similarly to employees: They pay only half of the contribution, and the KSK covers the other half.

Advertisement

Or they can obtain an exemption from the insurance mandate and take out private health insurance. But this is often a decision for life. Only within the first three years after starting their activity can artists declare to the KSK that their exemption from the insurance mandate should end. And then become publicly insured again. After that, a return is often only possible if they give up their self-employment and switch to an employment relationship.

This limited right of return is a problem for many artists. They often have fluctuating incomes, sometimes it disappears entirely, and overall, earnings in the industry are not high on average. The annual average income of members insured with the Artists' Social Fund is currently €14,500, according to the pension insurance.

If creatives take out private health insurance, their contribution to health protection is not tied to income: unlike in the GKV. If premiums rise or income disappears, many feel overwhelmed. Here, the federal government wanted to take action and enable creatives to return to the GKV system even after the three-year period. The corresponding amendment to the Artists' Social Insurance Act (KSVG) explicitly argues with the "need for protection" of the insured.

The Proposed Reform: A Six-Year Limit with a High Income Hurdle

Concretely, the reform now provides that the exemption from the insurance mandate automatically ends after six years. Artists may only remain in private health insurance (PKV) if they can exceed the annual income threshold (Jahresarbeitsentgeltgrenze) for three consecutive years. This threshold will be €66,600 gross income per annum in 2023: or €5,550 per month. For many artists, achieving such a high income—consistently—is unrealistic.

Consequently, the Association of Private Health Insurers (PKV-Verband) is up in arms. The federal government is "significantly interfering in the system competition between GKV and PKV. This blocks the affected groups' path into the PKV," states a position paper.

The PKV Association's Arguments: Unfair Treatment and Hindered Competition

From the PKV association's perspective, artists are disadvantaged twice by the new law. "For self-employed artists and journalists—unlike all other full-time self-employed individuals—the previous principle of income-independent insurance freedom should no longer apply. In the future, they are no longer exempt from the insurance mandate due to their activity but must additionally prove an income above the annual income threshold. This unequal treatment disregards the classification of this group as full-time self-employed earners—also confirmed by the Federal Constitutional Court," writes the association.

Furthermore, the dependence of insurance freedom on exceeding the annual income threshold has so far only been provided for employees in the Social Code. "The freedom of choice for self-employed individuals to secure coverage in Private Health Insurance is thereby significantly restricted," writes the association. This applies all the more against the background that the rules here are stricter than for employees: They do not have to prove three consecutive years of exceeding the income threshold.

"The planned amendment to the Artists' Social Insurance Act is nothing less than a taboo break," criticizes PKV Association Director Florian Reuther the draft law. "The federal government is thereby interfering in the competition between GKV and PKV to the detriment of Private Health Insurance. In consequence, the path into the PKV is practically blocked for artists and journalists."

Advertisement

The Broader Battle: The Rising Income Threshold

In any case, the high annual income threshold is a thorn in the side of the association: also with regard to employees. In October, the association already called for the threshold to be lowered. For years, it has been rising and rising: fewer and fewer employees earn enough to switch to the PKV. From the PKV association's perspective, the high threshold does not serve to protect employees from excessively high premiums but is intended to bind high-earning employees to the statutory health insurance to strengthen its financial base.

Analysis: The Core of the Debate

This conflict highlights fundamental tensions in Germany's dual health insurance system:

• Consumer Protection vs. Freedom of Choice: The government argues it is protecting a vulnerable group (artists with volatile incomes) from being locked into expensive, income-independent PKV premiums. The PKV association argues this removes a fundamental choice and unfairly singles out one profession.
• System Competition: The PKV sees this as a political move to bolster the financially strained GKV by restricting access to its competitor.
• The Role of the Income Threshold: This debate is part of a larger fight over the annual income limit, which acts as the primary gatekeeper between the GKV and PKV systems for employees.

A US Perspective: Parallels in Insurance Access and Mandates

While the US lacks a direct equivalent to Germany's artist-specific rules, the debate echoes familiar themes:

• Affordability for Freelancers: Self-employed individuals and gig workers in the US also struggle with the cost of individual health insurance plans, which are not income-scaled like employer group plans or subsidized marketplace plans.
• Government Shaping Markets: Regulations like the Affordable Care Act (ACA) created marketplaces and subsidies, directly influencing who can access private insurance and under what terms—similar to how Germany's income threshold and proposed KSVG changes shape the market.
• Medicare Eligibility: For older Americans, eligibility for Medicare at age 65 provides a guaranteed, affordable public option, somewhat analogous to the GKV safety net. The debate about lowering the Medicare age mirrors discussions about adjusting Germany's income threshold.

The German proposal underscores a universal challenge: balancing the sustainability of public systems, consumer protection for vulnerable groups, and preserving meaningful competition and choice in private health insurance markets. For artists, freelancers, and self-employed individuals everywhere, navigating health insurance remains a complex and critical financial decision, often requiring expert advice from a knowledgeable insurance broker or financial advisor.

Insurers and brokers are struggling in claims management with high backlogs, increasing claim frequencies, a shortage of skilled workers, and growing customer expectations. Manual processes are expensive and slow.